Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 09:51
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 97.9
1-Core 139
2-Core 277
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 695
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 232
Parallax 249
160% 226 fps
MRender 264
Gravity 224
Splatting 142
165% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 133 86 84 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 445
Write 324
Mixed 281
SusWrite 112
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 42
160% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 144
137% 210 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 97%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
99GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 229 229 232 232 227 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 400
Mixed 316
SusWrite 229
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 60.2
208% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 355
269% 362 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
340GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 314 414 414 417 416 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 415
Write 456
Mixed 318
SusWrite 366
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 44.6
151% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 180
156% 225 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 107%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
207GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 544 359 93 93 96 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 722
Write 662
Mixed 595
SusWrite 213
123% 548 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 75
267% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 465
382% 546 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 151%
Great: 255%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
114GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 138 138 140 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 148
Write 112
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 139
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 26
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 25.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 46.7
86% 46.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback