Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Memory 55 1-Core 36.6 2-Core 67.3 34% 53 Pts	4-Core 73.4 8-Core 71.7 10% 72.6 Pts	64-Core 74.1 5% 74.1 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 220 1,709 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 5220) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.59 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3600RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 55 61 61 62 64 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.8% Poor	Read 204 Write 98.3 Mixed 93.1 SusWrite 54.8 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 8.8 34% 9.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 2048, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16