Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '20 at 23:53
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 82.2 1-Core 144 2-Core 289 93% 171 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 903 88% 723 Pts	64-Core 1,395 86% 1,395 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 664GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 982 982 984 959 986 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 1,158 Write 1,029 Mixed 807 SusWrite 962 222% 989 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 62.9 223% 82.7 MB/s	DQ Read 678 DQ Write 829 DQ Mixed 270 338% 592 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 295%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 27GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 179 87 72 71 87 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29% Poor	Read 217 Write 100 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 134 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 8.5 38% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 16 DQ Mixed 70 38% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 100%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 803GB free Firmware: 411030WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 337 342 346 339 347 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 387 Write 347 Mixed 298 SusWrite 337 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 57.9 4K Mixed 34.1 114% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 162 133% 190 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 117%
Seagate ST640LM000 HM641JI 640GB 1,289 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 595GB free Firmware: 2AJ10003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 90 90 90 90 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 87.4 Write 41.2 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 88.3 49% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 50%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 255GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 96 94 96 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 117 Write 118 Mixed 76.4 SusWrite 94.6 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 86%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 2TB 944 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 129 129 130 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 104 Write 121 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 127 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.8 198% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 566GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 68 68 67 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 56.9 Write 64.9 Mixed 30 SusWrite 67.6 75% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 39,970 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	87.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 34.6 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 24 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 30.7 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	869x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16