Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 23:44
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$300
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 267
100% 172 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 915
97% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,060
71% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 507
Reflection 505
Parallax 585
133% 532 fps
MRender 274
Gravity 532
Splatting 292
139% 366 fps
Poor: 120%
This bench: 138%
Great: 147%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1329 1157 793 794 799 796 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2060
Write 1,641
Mixed 1476
SusWrite 945
342% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 53.2
160% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1243
DQ Write 1025
DQ Mixed 1,154
859% 1,141 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 241%
Great: 334%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$69
149GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 385 405 439 443 317 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 466
Mixed 430
SusWrite 396
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 41
136% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 361
272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 132%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
166GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 1136 759 757 754 761 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,233
Write 1,123
Mixed 1,092
SusWrite 887
244% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 52.3
163% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,290
DQ Write 1,100
DQ Mixed 1,198
897% 1,196 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 207%
Great: 334%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 187 188 188 187 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 145
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 186
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 187 186 186 186 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 142
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 184
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 31.7
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 32.8
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 7,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $544SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback