Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JP
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 21:53
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 286
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 650
75% 582 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 15
Parallax 16.8
14% 16.1 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 29.9
19% 21.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 515 477 423 421 424 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,263
Write 1,204
Mixed 1,056
SusWrite 447
222% 992 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 66.8
243% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 719
DQ Mixed 686
539% 747 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 187%
Great: 179%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 98 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 108
Write 66.2
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 97.1
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 26
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 89%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback