Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 19:41
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 224
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 576
62% 490 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 82.2
77% 87.8 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 79.4
Splatting 77.3
74% 92.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 231 236 227 219 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 420
Write 351
Mixed 287
SusWrite 243
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 38.1
131% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 255
217% 318 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 134%
Thnsf5256gpuk TOSHIBA 256GB
14GB free
Firmware: 51055KLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 48 85 45 42 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 309
Write 106
Mixed 173
SusWrite 54.4
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 6.7
74% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 747
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 91.6
157% 325 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
72GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 94 93 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65% Good
Read 132
Write 60.1
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 93.6
69% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
68GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 96 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 122
Write 33.5
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 94.8
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback