Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 18:00
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$290
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 747
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 1,142
77% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$330
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84% Excellent
Lighting 354
Reflection 306
Parallax 359
93% 340 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 309
Splatting 238
84% 252 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$160
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 222 207 183 185 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 481
Write 305
Mixed 249
SusWrite 201
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 37.4
142% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 125
142% 245 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 110%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
123GB free
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 95 45 57 72 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 450
Write 294
Mixed 182
SusWrite 88.4
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 7
59% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 21.5
34% 66.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 58%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$120
270GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 442 421 420 418 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 482
Mixed 412
SusWrite 419
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 54.2
177% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 252
222% 331 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 117%
Great: 126%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$95
949GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 100 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 122
Write 59.1
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 99.3
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 74%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$155
2TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 153 154 157 153 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 142
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 155
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
274% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 111%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
115GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 34.6
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 14.8
27% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
36% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$85
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 34.4
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 32.3
96% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 9,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $973
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $275Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback