| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock B450M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191209 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 23 '20 at 17:54 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
89.8%
Excellent
|
93% 175 Pts
|
94% 778 Pts
|
88% 1,425 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Nvidia(10DE 13A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.5%
Average
|
39% 49.5 fps
|
49% 59.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 365 364 366 364 366 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
88% 394 MB/s
|
147% 54.9 MB/s
|
224% 330 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
470GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 176 167 173 160 179 MB/s
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
98% 134 MB/s
|
146% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.2%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
44% 91.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 8,943 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,917x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,683x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 605x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 720x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 499x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 473x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $437 |