HP 520-1000it

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 520-1000it  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AC3
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111108
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 11:24
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 136
54% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 136
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2AC3) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 236 237 237 238 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.3% Good
Read 250
Write 239
Mixed 236
SusWrite 233
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 31.7
102% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 181
142% 196 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-054.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
20.8% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback