HP 110-201ep

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 110-201ep  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B05
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 11:10
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 42.4
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 62.1
28% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 118
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
HP(103C 2B05) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.301.1001.1001
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 2.62
2% 3.01 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10.2
Write 47.9
Mixed 10.1
17% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
I0MEGA Mini128MB*IOM2D5 0GB
0GB free, PID 2499
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 5
Write 1.3
Mixed 2.5
3% 2.93 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback