Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote TM85 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TM85
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '20 at 09:46
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Memory 50 1-Core 42.7 2-Core 78.5 35% 57.1 Pts	4-Core 80 8-Core 85.5 11% 82.8 Pts	64-Core 65.3 4% 65.3 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 1,680 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.47% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 0.56 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.22 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.47% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 480GB 632 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 269GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 215 146 40 37 78 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.6% Poor	Read 234 Write 204 Mixed 216 SusWrite 121 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 0.9 29% 8.67 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 19.8 DQ Mixed 1 24% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 101%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB 6,219 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 0GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.4 Write 6.5 Mixed 8.5 12% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2 109% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 21.6 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 23.6 31% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown H6451U64F9333G 2x4GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 8.6 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	20x
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
S280 1TBKingdianBench 85%, 769 samples	2x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	6x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 28%, 1,570 samples	4x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16