Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 03:48
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 113
46% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 507
43% 369 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 60
Parallax 56.1
52% 59.9 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 62.2
51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WDS120G2G0B- 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 32 29 53 26 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
201GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 54 42 38 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 98
Mixed 35
SusWrite 45.1
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
223GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 124 128 144 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 129
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 109%
Storejet Transcend 1TB
17GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 63.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 66
40% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.1
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $323
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback