| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140514 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 23 '20 at 00:06 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | GTM-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.9%
Very good
|
79% 137 Pts
|
48% 367 Pts
|
25% 403 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
|
35.4%
Below average
|
37% 38.9 fps
|
32% 39.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 336 337 339 342 338 MB/s
|
95.3%
Outstanding
|
77% 341 MB/s
|
162% 53 MB/s
|
149% 207 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 172 171 173 173 172 MB/s
|
92%
Outstanding
|
95% 130 MB/s
|
144% 1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 155 155 154 156 MB/s
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
89% 121 MB/s
|
148% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 157 157 156 157 156 MB/s
|
94.4%
Outstanding
|
99% 136 MB/s
|
151% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2133EL Series 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
62.6%
Good
|
64% 22.5 GB/s
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
63% 63.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,562 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 528x |
| Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 272x |
| Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 181x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 122x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 116x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 112x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $1,163 |