HP 260-p022cn

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 260-p022cn  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B4
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 23:40
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 171
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 259
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 81B4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 6.16
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.04
2% 2.79 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 480GB
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 213 7.7 87 29 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 483
Write 388
Mixed 373
SusWrite 74
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 0420 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.6
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 18.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback