Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 23:30
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$75
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 215
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 376
53% 383 Pts
64-Core 405
27% 405 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$215
Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 266
Reflection 212
Parallax 248
70% 242 fps
MRender 77.7
Gravity 224
Splatting 168
56% 157 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 444
Write 356
Mixed 330
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 20.7
110% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 36.8
71% 140 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 104%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
120GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 103 103 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 74.8
Write 27.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 99.9
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 78%
Samsung HD502HJ 320GB
131GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 42 39 53 64 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 66.3
Write 61.8
Mixed 47
SusWrite 49.5
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 125%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $317
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback