Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855D-12C (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Renmore
Memory	4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '20 at 21:03
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Memory 31 1-Core 17 2-Core 33.8 18% 27.3 Pts	4-Core 32.8 8-Core 32.5 4% 32.7 Pts	64-Core 31.2 2% 31.2 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FB33) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.83% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 1.19 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.01 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.83% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 120GB SSD 120GB 3,381 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 253 268 173 77 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 309 Write 264 Mixed 283 SusWrite 174 58% 257 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 10.2 41% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 83.9 DQ Write 74.8 DQ Mixed 36.5 39% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 800, 667 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 5.3 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 3.3 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 249 16% 249 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16