Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160829
Uptime	11.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '20 at 17:25
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 121 2-Core 244 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 807 76% 633 Pts	64-Core 1,233 76% 1,233 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 163 Reflection 184 Parallax 191 133% 179 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 173 Splatting 123 113% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59 8,648 User benchmarks, average bench 193% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 515 400 392 372 375 373 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,688 Write 1,533 Mixed 1,336 SusWrite 405 277% 1,240 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 60.2 213% 79.9 MB/s	DQ Read 855 DQ Write 605 DQ Mixed 782 570% 748 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 228%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 64GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 95 97 87 89 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 295 Write 110 Mixed 162 SusWrite 107 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 21.1 84% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 46.1 DQ Write 49.4 DQ Mixed 44 34% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 167GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 139 141 298 144 206 MB/s Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.3% Good	Read 228 Write 84.4 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 199 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 34.1 99% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 168 153% 228 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x8GB 1,118 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	MC Read 53.9 MC Write 61.1 MC Mixed 50.4 158% 55.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 22.5 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 117%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

SSD
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $122Bench 421%, 18,218 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	9x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	14x
9965600-033.A00G 4x16GBUnknownBench 99%, 23 samples	9x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $625

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16