| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141202 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 22 '20 at 16:31 |
| Run Duration | 244 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4100-$110
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
41%
Average
|
39% 59.2 Pts
|
16% 119 Pts
|
10% 169 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.7%
Below average
|
25% 48.5 fps
|
45% 56.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 107 109 110 114 115 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
28% 127 MB/s
|
55% 18.9 MB/s
|
25% 35.8 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
277GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 21 16 5.9 25 12 MB/s
|
31.5%
Below average
|
41% 55.7 MB/s
|
92% 0.53 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
371GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 91 90 89 91 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
102% 77.5 MB/s
|
90% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
30.9%
Below average
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
14% 4.93 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,858 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 508x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 325x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $128 |