Asus B85M-G

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180323
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '20 at 16:07
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 67 1-Core 64.1 2-Core 120 50% 83.7 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 200 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C306) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.1% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 110 Parallax 104 85% 106 fps	MRender 78.2 Gravity 102 Splatting 88.8 74% 89.7 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,809 Write 2,435 Mixed 2,067 542% 2,437 MB/s	4K Read 191 4K Write 86.8 4K Mixed 95.5 457% 124 MB/s	DQ Read 876 DQ Write 727 DQ Mixed 839 618% 814 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 72GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 307 305 306 306 296 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 398 Write 374 Mixed 370 SusWrite 314 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 62.8 4K Mixed 36.1 118% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 346 261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 128%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 885GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 180 179 180 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 198 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 179 121% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 4,223 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 11.8 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	959x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	786x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	532x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	481x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	402x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	368x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	259x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	163x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	156x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16