Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100420
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 15:46
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5649
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 137
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 317
37% 286 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.7% Good
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 75
63% 76.5 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 74.2
60% 72.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0P07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 56 32 35 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 120
Write 42.8
Mixed 109
SusWrite 46.1
18% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 22.3
76% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 42.2
DQ Mixed 28.8
23% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
54GB free
Firmware: XMO4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 61 33 36 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 121
Write 114
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 49.4
67% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
83GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 119 119 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 120
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
29GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 58 59 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 12.2
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 58.1
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
24GB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 55 59 55 73 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 117
Mixed 52
SusWrite 69.6
105% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
171% 2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 52%
EAGET HDD 2TB
37GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 89 80 69 59 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 75
101% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback