Biostar IH61MF-Q5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar IH61MF-Q5  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171024
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 08:43
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 199
79% 132 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 536
55% 434 Pts
64-Core 532
36% 532 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$146
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 139
Reflection 82.4
Parallax 124
37% 115 fps
MRender 81.1
Gravity 128
Splatting 85
34% 97.9 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1201A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 192 203 159 121 123 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.1% Average
Read 207
Write 202
Mixed 180
SusWrite 150
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 20.2
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 26.5
28% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
214GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 119 119 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 120
Write 106
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 113
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
12GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 13.5
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 12.2
24% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.6
181% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown D3R8GL16B8R 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical IH61MF-Q5 Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar IH61MF-Q5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $112
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $142Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback