Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 31.2 2-Core 56 35% 51 Pts	4-Core 98.5 8-Core 241 19% 170 Pts	64-Core 481 30% 481 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GB 2,316 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 351GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT05L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 259 320 342 356 337 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 426 Write 381 Mixed 290 SusWrite 331 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 18.7 62% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 115 106% 161 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 Micron 36KSF1G72P... 64GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.5% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 26.5 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	494x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	260x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16