Monster TULPAR T5 V17.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V17.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Standard Standard
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180503
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '20 at 19:18
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 222 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 624 63% 509 Pts	64-Core 697 43% 697 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Device(1D05 1045) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5638 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Lighting 62.4 Reflection 68.8 Parallax 55.2 51% 62.2 fps	MRender 66.6 Gravity 97.7 Splatting 62.3 61% 75.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$82 74,184 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 813 Write 1,084 Mixed 730 196% 876 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 49.6 160% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 867 DQ Write 607 DQ Mixed 478 427% 651 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 474GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 75 70 74 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 65.8 Write 59.1 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 74.2 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 10.5 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V17.1 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V17.1

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	186x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	106x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	80x

SSD
XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $40Bench 119%, 8,737 samples	39x
XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdataBench 177%, 12,504 samples	22x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $59Bench 213%, 34,063 samples	18x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	26x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $40

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16