Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7250-$97 3,604 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Memory 46.9 1-Core 4.2 2-Core 40.3 21% 30.5 Pts	4-Core 33.7 8-Core 34.2 4% 34 Pts	64-Core 43 3% 43 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 634 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 15B2) 128MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 0.38 0% 0.77 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 1.13 1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: R032 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 44 162 74 21 41 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.9% Very poor	Read 160 Write 18.2 Mixed 95.7 SusWrite 73.7 19% 87 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 26% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.43 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 3 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T7300Intel $90Bench 34%, 2,712 samples	2x
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples	2x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2400ATIBench 1%, 634 samples	4x

SSD
SUV500120G 120GBKingstonBench 68%, 4,749 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $90

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16