| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3167-A1 |
| Memory | 7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121217 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 21 '20 at 13:47 |
| Run Duration | 106 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
60.1%
Good
|
69% 116 Pts
|
28% 208 Pts
|
15% 241 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
49.5%
Average
|
50% 67.5 fps
|
48% 59.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 65 90 91 100 101 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
46% 62.9 MB/s
|
104% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
47.5%
Average
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
39% 13.8 GB/s
|
54% 74.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS W520 Builds (Compare 48 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 16x |
| Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples | 12x |
| Xeon E3-1245 V2Intel $368Bench 73%, 2,442 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 11x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 800 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $380 |