Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130626
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '17 at 09:32
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	LBN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 182 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 505 54% 430 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7892 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 20.7 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 22.9 17% 20.6 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 24 Splatting 19.2 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 714GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 61 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 10 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2048915673	105% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 396 Mixed 408 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 44.5 156% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 128 140% 238 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 782GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 166 166 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4715 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 9450 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1317 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14221333 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 71 71 291715 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 201864314900 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	53.5% Above average	Read 93.8 Write 92.8 Mixed 90.7 70% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.17 61% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73CB0-YK0 4x8GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	54.3% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 15.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QOSMIO X70-A Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	197x
Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples	4x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	138x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	61x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	3x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	6x

RAM
M471B1G73CB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 128 samples	21x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,157 samples	17x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16