| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M IB-R (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1750 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190726 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 21 '20 at 04:19 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 91% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
61.6%
Good
|
62% 112 Pts
|
57% 468 Pts
|
37% 592 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
63.9%
Good
|
68% 74.8 fps
|
55% 67.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer AS340 240GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 207 66 161 156 184 MB/s
|
43.1%
Average
|
38% 167 MB/s
|
44% 17.1 MB/s
|
96% 188 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
704GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 163 163 164 162 165 MB/s
|
95.1%
Outstanding
|
108% 148 MB/s
|
207% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
32.7%
Below average
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
29% 136 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M IB-R Builds (Compare 3,245 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M IB-R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 2,170x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 857x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 62x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 1,168x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 692x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 523x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $805 |