Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion X2 Ultra Mobile ZM-86 35 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	22% Poor	Memory 35.1 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 54.5 25% 39.9 Pts	4-Core 52.7 8-Core 51.8 7% 52.2 Pts	64-Core 53.5 3% 53.5 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9100M G 317 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 014A) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.28% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.54 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.32 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.39 0% 0.45 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.28% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM800 2.5" 128GB 1,159 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM25D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 127 106 131 133 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 183 Write 131 Mixed 141 SusWrite 125 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 7.5 34% 9.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 226 18% 226 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Turion X2 Ultra Mobile ZM-80AMDBench 33%, 180 samples	1x
Athlon X2 Dual-Core QL-62AMDBench 29%, 379 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9100M GNvidiaBench 0%, 317 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16