Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '20 at 01:38
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 156 2-Core 314 102% 188 Pts	4-Core 628 8-Core 918 96% 773 Pts	64-Core 912 56% 912 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 12FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 112 Parallax 123 97% 118 fps	MRender 146 Gravity 100 Splatting 81.4 86% 109 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,332 Write 2,071 Mixed 1,464 434% 1,956 MB/s	4K Read 59 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 82.6 277% 98.9 MB/s	DQ Read 999 DQ Write 1,649 DQ Mixed 1,150 921% 1,266 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 510GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 460 465 461 461 463 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 459 Mixed 444 SusWrite 462 103% 456 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 62.1 203% 73.7 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 354 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 406GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 138 139 140 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 134 Write 141 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 140 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2747 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 35.1 MC Mixed 25.3 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 27.4 82% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $275

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	771x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	612x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	482x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	207x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	186x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	166x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	151x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	123x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	82x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $877

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16