Asus P7H55-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-V  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 22:35
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 61
38% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 242
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 67 68 68 68 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 61
Write 59.2
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 68.1
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD120IJ 120GB
105GB free
Firmware: WZ100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 53
Write 54.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 56
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-V Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback