Asus N501JW

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus N501JW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N501JW
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150724
Uptime	8.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '20 at 20:54
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 204 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 495 54% 428 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 18DD) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 19.7 19% 20.2 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 22.5 Splatting 16.9 17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GB 7,448 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2301Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 68 64 60 50 45 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 463 Write 129 Mixed 165 SusWrite 60.3 44% 204 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 21.4 90% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 40.2 DQ Mixed 58.4 55% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB 20,023 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 730GB free Firmware: SE0OA4A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 105 105 105 105 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 105 Write 3.7 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 98.3 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.1 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N501JW Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N501JW

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	115x
Core i7-4750HQIntelBench 63%, 5,497 samples	24x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	71x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	54x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 5,483 samples	14x

SSD
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $290Bench 185%, 5,772 samples	47x
X300s SATA M.2 256GBSanDiskBench 77%, 785 samples	12x
MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,448 samples	11x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung 8GBHynixBench 53%, 676 samples	33x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GBHynixBench 51%, 658 samples	33x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix 16GBSamsungBench 53%, 472 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16