Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 20:42
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$209
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 267
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 787
78% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,034
69% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$250
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.9% Above average
Lighting 217
Reflection 197
Parallax 207
57% 207 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 208
Splatting 160
57% 172 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 1002 434 258 255 257 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,268
Write 1,025
Mixed 1,056
SusWrite 538
218% 971 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 68.1
236% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 791
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 781
588% 784 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 192%
Great: 208%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$65
125GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 447 448 450 399 383 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 440
Mixed 427
SusWrite 429
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 53.6
175% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 203
148% 191 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 109%
Great: 130%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55
210GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 427 427 430 371 376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 424
Mixed 414
SusWrite 410
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 47.5
152% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 186
137% 179 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 100%
Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$98
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 86 84 95 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35% Below average
Read 36
Write 80.4
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 86.1
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 35%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 500GB
41GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 25 22 16 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Read 10.4
Write 20.9
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 19.1
22% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 26.3
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 26
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 10,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $946
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback