Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121015
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '17 at 03:57
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 127 58% 93.9 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 409 40% 326 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.9% Very good	Lighting 93.3 Reflection 100 Parallax 86.3 76% 93.3 fps	MRender 88.4 Gravity 86.9 Splatting 89.8 72% 88.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 256GB-$109 1,725 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: JTRA0102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6109 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1206 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 183 183 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C2) HDA temperature 77 63 158914641943 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	60.9% Good	Read 365 Write 348 Mixed 343 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 17.6 75% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 82.7 DQ Mixed 16 23% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 107%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 22GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8511 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2656 (B1) Unknown 95 95 174 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 59 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 8 (EB) Unknown 99 1 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24237044026	71.5% Very good	Read 391 Write 392 Mixed 311 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 20.7 97% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 97.5 DQ Mixed 21 29% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 110%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8383 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2912 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10248 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2217 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 79 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2832 (C2) HDA temperature 129 107 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	75.2% Very good	Read 139 Write 123 Mixed 90.8 88% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.45 132% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 350 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	37x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	5x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
T25 31TBTeamBench 58%, 15 samples	3x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	4x
99U5403-159.A01LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 52%, 29 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $813

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16