PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Packard imedia S3810 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Packard imedia S3810 |
Memory | 3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100331 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 20 '20 at 19:37 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
|
62.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gainward(10B0 1187) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 116 131 130 134 131 MB/s
|
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB
106GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 23 23 23 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
25%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples | 43x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 24x |
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 18x |
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples | 16x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $110 |