Asus G751JT

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 32% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G751JT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G751JT
Memory	6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141029
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '20 at 17:20
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	58%
CPU Throttled	32%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 73 47% 69.8 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 217 24% 192 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Asus(1043 22DA) 3GB CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.75 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	10.9% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 4.46 Parallax 15.3 13% 11.8 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 12.8 Splatting 7.74 7% 8.98 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s Non-Secure 256GB 2,451 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2150000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 209 210 203 197 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 291 Write 228 Mixed 140 SusWrite 206 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 14.2 41% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 118 127% 215 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 131GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 67 67 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 106 Write 108 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 66.9 55% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14.7 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 13.9 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G751JT Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Asus G751JT

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	370x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	209x
Core i7-4750HQIntelBench 63%, 5,497 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	466x
GeForce GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 6,247 samples	165x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	1x

SSD
X300s Non-Secure 256GBSanDiskBench 82%, 2,451 samples	60x
X300s Non-Secure 128GBSanDiskBench 75%, 1,499 samples	50x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	17x

RAM
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	122x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	106x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	61x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16