| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | INTEL_ DH55TC__ |
| Motherboard | Intel DH55TC (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100614 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 20 '20 at 15:07 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 73% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.7%
Average
|
52% 85.4 Pts
|
24% 182 Pts
|
11% 182 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Intel(8086 0036) 731MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
|
0.82%
Terrible
|
1% 0.92 fps
|
1% 1.18 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 46 36 49 40 50 MB/s
|
25.6%
Poor
|
16% 75.2 MB/s
|
45% 12.7 MB/s
|
28% 39.4 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
511GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 78 53 92 70 85 MB/s
|
41.8%
Average
|
44% 60.1 MB/s
|
173% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99P5471-002.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.9%
Very poor
|
22% 7.6 GB/s
|
0% 0.1 GB/s
|
36% 110 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical DH55TC Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel DH55TC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 45x |
| Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 17x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 48x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $89 |