Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X542UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X542UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X542UF
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 13:46
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 85.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 183
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 170
26% 187 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 10D1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4187
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 12
11% 11.9 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 13
Splatting 8.7
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1002 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 110 90 85 74 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 430
Write 252
Mixed 272
SusWrite 92
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 44.4
162% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 252
195% 268 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
18GB free
Firmware: AM0B3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 71 50 75 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 66.9
Write 65.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 68.5
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 60%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power4G 4GB
3GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.1 3.6 4.1 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 9.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3.8
11% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X542UF Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X542UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback