Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H310MHP  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 18:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 215
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 365
49% 367 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 120GB SSD 120GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 433
Write 334
Mixed 47.2
59% 272 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 2.8
52% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 81.8
DQ Write 46.3
DQ Mixed 0.9
18% 43 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 91%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
25GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 63 60 65 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 82.2
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 57
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TYA4U2666D19081C 0813 TYA4U2666D19082C 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.6% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $271
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback