Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-HD2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 08:24
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 176
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 337
46% 334 Pts
64-Core 343
23% 343 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.7% Above average
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 64.6
62% 71.4 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 72.8
42% 71 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 50 51 69 32 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 307
Write 242
Mixed 114
SusWrite 54.3
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 11.1
21% 7.8 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 156
126% 173 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 162 166 162 187 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 175
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 169
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 98%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
29GB free, PID 00ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 27 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 28.5
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 17.8
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
30% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$58
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 22.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $391
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $181
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback