Pegatron AP480C-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardPegatron AP480C-S  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 01:39
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 63.5
37% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 120
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics
Device(1B0A 82F1) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.51 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS5C1050CLA382 500GB
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 9.7 7.3 10 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 3.8
SusWrite 11.9
6% 7.92 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback