Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 20:30
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$379
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 852
84% 669 Pts
64-Core 1577
106% 1577 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$800
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
142% Outstanding
Lighting 560
Reflection 503
Parallax 613
147% 559 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 550
Splatting 289
142% 367 fps
Poor: 119%
This bench: 142%
Great: 147%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
665GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0411BB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1052 1099 905 918 919 911 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,264
Write 1,464
Mixed 190
SusWrite 967
269% 1,221 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 61.1
195% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 578
472% 673 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 243%
Great: 365%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$300
175GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 437 361 334 328 334 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 420
Write 438
Mixed 377
SusWrite 372
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 33.3
112% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 103%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
112GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 908 900 889 843 902 882 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1929
Write 921
Mixed 739
SusWrite 887
248% 1,119 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 45.6
161% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 376
332% 513 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 207%
Great: 239%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$230
4TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 161 167 172 175 169 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 164
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 170
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
179% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94%
Great: 122%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$77
720GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 87 88 86 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 63.3
Write 60.5
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 87.1
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4B.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 36.6
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 27.8
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 10,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $946
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback