| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970A-G/3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160112 |
| Uptime | 11.8 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 18 '20 at 18:19 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 49% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.3%
Above average
|
56% 91 Pts
|
34% 275 Pts
|
22% 358 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
102%
Outstanding
|
96% 142 fps
|
116% 146 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 25 31 29 29 MB/s
|
||||
|
Aps-sl3n -1T 1TB
805GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 197 205 226 248 232 MB/s
|
67.3%
Good
|
61% 272 MB/s
|
94% 32.4 MB/s
|
150% 212 MB/s
|
|
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
353GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 137 136 140 133 MB/s
|
75.4%
Very good
|
88% 119 MB/s
|
262% 2.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.5%
Average
|
42% 14.5 GB/s
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
48% 83.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 112x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $269 |