Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$170 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 148 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 219 29% 219 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 128GB-$37 920 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4162000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 94 56 25 38 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 362 Write 240 Mixed 191 SusWrite 68 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 19.6 79% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 45.6 DQ Mixed 25.6 22% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 269GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 20 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 27 Write 11.4 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 20 24% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8F M378B5773CH0-CH9 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.8% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	449x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	394x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	79x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16