PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120713 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '20 at 17:17 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 62% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
64.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
PwrHis(1787 2325) 3GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 97 93 88 112 124 MB/s
|
49.4%
Average
|
|||
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
57GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 384 386 396 404 400 MB/s
|
88.8%
Excellent
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
15GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 7.4 11 11 11 12 MB/s
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
187GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 35 35 34 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 1,520x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 948x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 556x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 309x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 268x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 237x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $581 |