Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 14:30
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 90
2-Core 170
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 413
45% 351 Pts
64-Core 485
32% 485 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$338
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 276
Reflection 234
Parallax 267
72% 259 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 244
Splatting 162
70% 210 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 92%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 161 151 139 139 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69% Good
Read 398
Write 339
Mixed 263
SusWrite 160
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 27.2
95% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 265
211% 296 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 69%
Great: 132%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
128GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 90 92 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 95.5
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 91.3
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
763GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 203 204 205 204 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 164
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 203
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 0215 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 0215 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $634
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $142Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $275Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $544SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback