| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191217 |
| Uptime | 3.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 18 '20 at 08:35 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
90.6%
Outstanding
|
87% 155 Pts
|
77% 617 Pts
|
43% 701 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
|
31.5%
Below average
|
32% 36.2 fps
|
31% 37.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 114 114 104 137 117 MB/s
|
163%
Outstanding
|
202% 276 MB/s
|
1,550% 9.23 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
615GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 16 34 17 10 MB/s
|
8.81%
Terrible
|
10% 13.9 MB/s
|
17% 0.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.4%
Below average
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
59% 67.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,513 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 389x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 342x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 145x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 116x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 84x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 74x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $263 |