Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 03:21
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 202
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 182
26% 189 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11E6) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 13.8
13% 14 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 18.2
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
112GB free
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 53 45 48 48 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 380
Write 297
Mixed 263
SusWrite 89.9
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 32.6
109% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 115
95% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 85%
MM0500EBKAE 500GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 63 60 71 80 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 55
Write 48.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 66.1
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
329GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 87 87 87 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 71.1
Mixed 51
SusWrite 86
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 19
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 8.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $263
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback