Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Memory 94.6 1-Core 148 2-Core 285 97% 176 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 873 87% 707 Pts	64-Core 1,096 68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3FC7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 88.1 Parallax 8.31 5% 34.3 fps	MRender 0.05 Gravity 0.03 Splatting 0.04 0% 0.04 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB 17,400 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3L1QEXF7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2406 Write 2,010 Mixed 1725 455% 2,047 MB/s	4K Read 62.7 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 81.4 267% 90.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,078 DQ Write 861 DQ Mixed 1,003 742% 981 MB/s
Poor: 156% Great: 296%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB 34,565 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	45.8% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 11.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 14.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 58.3 69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	2,025x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	1,986x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	1,325x

SSD
RPITJ512VME2OWD 512GBUmisBench 222%, 1,771 samples	626x
SKHynix_HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B 512GBBench 169%, 11,687 samples	614x
MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,504 samples	404x

RAM
LV32D4S2S8HD-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 91%, 10,928 samples	1,399x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	936x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples	595x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16