PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 14 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 17 '20 at 22:49 |
Run Duration | 185 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5570-$70
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
64.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
Gigabyte(1458 22E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 171 153 152 150 152 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
119GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 208 206 208 205 207 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1001 256GB
110GB free
Firmware: 11130101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 371 367 367 364 368 MB/s
|
95.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
140GB free
Firmware: DC8110E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 206 204 206 203 205 MB/s
|
65.7%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
656GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 192 191 190 191 191 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT41GU7BFR8C-RD ID:80 2C 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E1 50GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 34816 MB
|
24.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 568x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 533x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 486x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 270x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 153x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 135x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 72x |
A400 480GBKingston $37Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |