Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 172
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 576
57% 463 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 6755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.28
6% 8.34 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 14.7
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.1% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 51.5
35% 51.4 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 56.3
45% 54.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000L2 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L0QBXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 290 290 290 287 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,127
Write 291
Mixed 298
SusWrite 289
109% 501 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 33.8
156% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 411
358% 551 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 137%
Great: 153%
HP emPMD HDD 500GB
335GB free, PID 480c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 76
Write 76.2
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 77.8
87% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 21.6
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback